Where is rbgh legal

Now stop and think about that for a minute, while correlation is not causation, breast cancer used to be something that women got later in life. But according to the Young Survival Coalition, one in women between the ages of 30 and 39 will be diagnosed with breast cancer in the next ten years. Why are all these young women now getting breast cancer? And what about the effects of IGFladen milk on older women, who are already at greater risk for breast cancer?

In case you think that the rising cancer rates have something to do with genetics, stop and think again. According to the Breast Cancer Fund, 1 in 8 women now have breast cancer. But only 10 percent of those cases can be linked to genetics. In other words, 90 percent of breast cancers being diagnosed today are being triggered by factors in our environment. How did our government agencies, responsible for ensuring the safety of our food, allow the use of this growth hormone and the sale of IGFladen milk?

Our interest is in selling as much of it as possible. Assuring its safety is the F. You read that right. In , only 9. Center for Food Safety is a tax-exempt c 3 organization. Any unauthorized reprint or use of this material is prohibited. No text may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without express written permission or proper citation.

Please credit any and all use of our work product to: Center for Food Safety, www. Please turn off your ad blocker to properly view this site. Both are a genetically engineered variation on naturally occurring hormone that farmers inject into cows to increase milk production by as much as 10 percent.

It has also been proven to increase the incidence of mastitis in cows , which as any breastfeeding mother knows is a painful condition requiring treatment by antibiotics — and indeed, rBGH use has also upped the use of antibiotics in dairy cattle.

The United States is the only developed nation to allow people to drink milk from cows given artificial growth hormone. All 27 countries of the European Union, Canada, New Zealand, Australia, and Canada have banned its use in milk destined for human consumption. Campaigns to restrict rBGH-free labeling were launched in 14 states, as this Ethicurean satire chronicled , but only Ohio passed the effort. Grist thanks its sponsors. Become one. Thanks to consumer pressure, approximately 60 percent of milk in the U.

As with many technological processes, the FDA relies on the fact that the end product, whether it be milk or genetically engineered fish, is indistinguishable in all detectable ways from its conventionally produced counterpart. He also observed that the FDA has not addressed the issue in a long time. However, data shows that organic milk contains less bovine growth hormone than conventional milk. A study conducted by Emory University in collaboration with The Organic Center found that bovine growth hormone levels were 20 times higher in conventional milk than in organic milk.

Not only does eliminating rBGH and other livestock hormones from dairy and meat reduce potential risk for humans, it also promotes humane animal treatment by reducing the proven health risks for the cows who provide us with food. Additionally, it can be argued that cows produce plenty of milk and meat without the need for added hormones. To us, keeping milk simple and natural is just plain common sense. The treated animal then loses its organic certification and must be removed from the organic herd.

What is rBGH? What is rBST?